Six in the Morning

1. THAT SINKING FEELING: Scientists gathering in Copenhagen at the International Scientific Congress on Climte Change warn that sea levels could rise twice as much as earlier predicted. (CBC via DeSmogBlog)

2. THAT SINKING FEELING II: Meanwhile, a gathering of climate change deniers in New York swap misinfo about the climate crisis and tales of being quoted favourably by Rush Limbaugh. Who's listening to these jokers? Well the National Post for one. And two. (DeSmogBlog)

3. THAT LIFE PRESERVER THEY'VE THROWN YOU IS AN ANVIL: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives economists indicate that with the bank rate close to zero, the tax cuts in Harper's stimulus package will actually have a negative impact on the economy. (CCPA website)

4. IF AT FIRST YOU CAN'T GESTAPO, TRY, TRY AGAIN: Harper's little minions are bringing in legislation to restore extraordinary police powers in cases where terrorism is suspected. They do this because everyday our police force demonstrates that they are to be trusted with even more power. (Globe and Mail.)

5. THE INTERNET WON'T SAVE YOU: Record traffic on the federal government's online job bank is bringing their servers to a standstill. (Globe and Mail)

6. THE POWERS OF POSITIVE DRINKING: Dr Malcolm Lloyd will be appearing on Good Morning America this week to discuss his findings that regular drinking (yes, of alcohol) can help stave off everything from the common cold, some forms of cancer and the onset of Alzheimers. It also has the added benefit of numbing your memory of the other five items in this Six in the Morning. Make mine a Manhattan, bartender... (New York Post)

March Madness

For all you NCAA college hoops fans out there, this probably sounds like a dream come true (the Onion).

More B.S.

Freelance writers are notorious for recycling material. So I'm going to take my Feb. 26 Ask Greg addressing all the fuss over Jessica Simpson's rumoured weight gain and convert it into a blog post on accusations that have been levelled against Britney Spears following the debut of her new Circus tour in New Orleans the other night that she's put on a pound or ten (InMusic). To make this work, all you have to do is re-read the column, and every time you encounter Jessica's name just substitute Britney's. Oh yeah, and instead of 34Ds it should be 38Cs.

This Week at City Hall

No time to scan the meeting agendas right now but I'll try and get back and add in highlights later. So, in short:

Monday, Mar 9
Regina Municipal Heritage Advisory Committee (12:15 pm)
City Council Meeting (5:30 pm)

Wednesday, Mar 11
Regina Planning Commission (4 pm)
Paratransit Advisory Board (5:30 pm)

Of course, if you're on tenterhooks to find out what these meetings are all about, you can read the agendas yourself and even all the relevant reports by clicking your way to the city's website.

Six In The Morning

Coming at you like a hurricane of facts and fury:

1 CUT, CUT, CUT Canadian autoworkers will vote on a plan to slash their wages and, more horribly, pensions to retired autoworkers after the Conservative minority federal government blackmailed them into taking cuts as "survivability" test for the auto industry. That kaboom you hear as you sip your Monday morning coffee? SFL leader Larry Hubich's head exploding. (Toronto Star, Larry Hubich's blog)

2 BACK TO BUSINESS King Ignatieff of the federal Liberals retrofits his party after last fall's failure at the polls. Dion's shade of green was so gaudy, anyway. (Toronto Star)

3 LA LA LA LA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU Speaking of un-greening, the Czech Republic just branded itself as a climate-change denying backwater when it's douchebag president addressed the world's largest convention of hacks, hucksters and freelance corporate apologists, including busybody Canadian denier Ross McItrick. You'd think with economies tanking and the north pole melting this wouldn't be the right time to share your anti-scientific claptrap and delusions of free market infallibility, but give these evil dorks points for consistency. (The Guardian)

4 FIFTY YEARS OF BARBIE The children's doll with the proportions of a breast-implanted sexbot turns 50 today (LA Times).

5 THREE YEARS Not really Monday news since the sentence came down Friday afternoon, but Christopher Pauchay, guilty of criminal negligience, is heading back to jail. (CBC)

6 THAT THING IS SMALLLLL The Leader-Post publishes a 28-page Monday edition. Prairie dog's in-house L-P archivist says that's the smallest he's ever seen the Monday paper. Not sure how a newspaper that puny is good for democracy and informed citizenry; prairie dog can't cover everything you know. Well, at least not yet.

The Rock Obama.

You knew this was coming. Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson was the guest host of Saturday Night Live on March 7, and, well ... American politics will never be the same ... complete with a dead-on impersonation of Obama's chief of staff.

I apologize in advance if you can't see this -- NBC doesn't like people from outside the U.s streaming its show, the network also gets persnickety if they appear on YouTube and unfortunately Hulu is following NBC's recommendations. If you click on this link and the videos from SNL become available, it's about a third of the way down the page, and titled (7) The Rock Obama.

In a show of bipartisanship, they also showed a Weekend Update Sketch where Republican National Committee chairman Micheal Steele was jabbed with an electric shock every time he said something Rush Limbaugh didn't like.

Now I've Watched The Watchman Too!

And I have to say my friend Paul Dechene is, once again, being a big softy. Then again, he's a Battlestar Galactica fan so I can't say I'm surprised.

I liked Watchmen well enough. The effort the director, Zack Snyder, put into keeping the story faithful borders on superheroic (haha) given the complexity of the material. I have no idea how someone who hasn't read the comic would understand half of what's going on in this flick. And that's one of the movie's problems: in it's attempt to honour the source material it stiffens up. You can see this most in the acting but it also permeates scene design--for example, some moments feel overblown, phoney or contrived because they're too focused on slavish recreation to the comic.

Well, the movie isn't a comic. They're different art forms with different rules, and sucessful adaptations of comics neeed to recognize that and be brave enough to play things a little differently. Especially when you're dealing with a comic that has more to it than punching out Lex Luthor.

One big problem Snyder has is that he's trying to adapt this particular comic book--a near-legendary comic that's a deconstruction of comics themselves. Yes, on one level Watchmen is an examination/commentary on superheroes, power, vigilanteism, etc. But on the deeper level Watchmen the comic is about time and its nature, and metaphors about time fill the book.

For example: one character, Dr. Manhattan, is a disintegrated physicist who now exists outside linear "reality". For him, moments are experienced in a non-sequential order: First he's in 1985 having a fight with his girfriend, now he's a child learning about watchmaking (speaking of time and rich, layered meanings) from his father in the 1930s, now he's locked in a particle discombobulatron getting microwaved-up into an atomic superhero, now he's on Mars having another fight with his girlfriend.

Dr. Manhattan's experience of time parallels the comic reader's experience of this dense graphic novel: you can read it in order but you can also experience it in a different but equally meaningful way if you open it to a random page (which you'll end up doing because the freaking thing weighs three pounds and takes a couple of days to read so you'll have to double back through pages just to keep the plot straight in your head).

Comics, because of their structure as sequential self-contained panels depicting a series of frozen moments, are an ideal medium to talk about time, it's relation to space (i.e. the space on a page) and even the fetishism of/obsession over the meaning inherent to a so-called "frozen moment". Watchmen's creator Alan Moore (who has vehemently disowned this movie) knew all this as a very, very clever comic creator, and he dicked around with these themes in Watchmen, his most famous and best-selling work.

In Watchmen, Moore's nudging his readers to ponder the nature of time--which, from what little I understand, the physicists say is wildly different from what we think it is.

Put it all together (like a dissambled watch!) and it's called a thesis: something real art has and something this movie lacks.

So Is Watchmen the movie better than Watchmen the comic? No way. But I got a kick out of it. Rorshach, a deranged Batman-type, and Dr. Manhattan, a big, blue, naked Superman with a big (really big!) atomic shlong, are two great characters. And I liked the action, and the gore, and Ozymandius' genetically-modified lynx and all the pretty colours and how shiny everything was.

And the changed ending was fine although I'm not convinced it makes sense. (I think it could've worked but they didn't sell me on it).

Then again, I'm not Alan Moore. He'd hate this thing.

Final review: "A" for effort. "B" for entertainment. But "F" for thinking this was artistically do-able. (And also for the lame-o"Forrest Gump" classic rock soundtrack. That really, really sucked. Jimi Hendrix? Simon and Garfunkel? Oh, come on. Been there, seen that, knock it off.)

Post Watchmen Watching Thoughts (Not a Review)

Went to see Watchmen last night and wanted to get something on record before I started talking to people and their opinions began to subtly influence mine:

I think I might like the movie Watchmen better than the comic.

Okay, I know. Heresy. "The book is always better than the movie." But I think in this case, as much as I hate to admit it, Hollywood might have gotten an adaptation right for a change.

A lot of people -- fans of the comic -- are going to point to all the things the movie lacked -- the Tales of the Black Freighter comic-within-a-comic, for instance. "But it's essential to the story," they'll say. Sure. Maybe. But truth be told, the first time or two I read Watchmen, I became wrapped up in the main storyline and mostly skipped the Black Freighter stuff. I only discovered it upon rereading -- and Watchmen is one of those comics I've read a bunch of times.

That was one of the innovations of Watchmen. Moore (writer) and Gibbons (artist) packed their comic full of tiny details, subplots, in jokes, oblique references to other comics and lengthy appendices. As guys who grew up on the form, they understood that when someone enjoyed your work, they poured over it and analyzed it. As such, they produced a work that stood up to that kind of scrutiny. Sounds like the DVD is going to include things like the Black Freighter story (as an animated film). And, from what I could see, the main feature will be just as rich a re-watching experience. Snyder (director) understands that nowadays, when someone likes your movie, they'll watch it repeatedly at home, pour over every frame and then analyze it at length online.

Meanwhile, what it might lack in richness because some of the comic had to be condensed or set aside for the DVD, I think it gains a richness from the acting. The leads all bring subtleties to their characters that could only be hinted at on the page.

There is bound to be one big controversy among fans of the comic though, and that's the ending. It was [spoiler alert] significantly changed from what was in the original story. And you know what, I'll have to go back and read the comic, but I think the new ending is better. It's more mature. And seems to tie everything together better. If someone wants to call me on that, go ahead. I'd be happy to respond in detail in the comments.[end spoilers]

Now, by saying I like Watchmen the Movie a little bit better than Watchmen the Original Comic isn't to say I think the movie should supplant the comic. As an art object, I may think the film edges out its source material but that doesn't change the fact that the comic is a much more important work of art. The original completely changed the way comics are written, drawn, read and understood. I may personally feel that the film is the best telling of this particular story, but at the end of the day, this movie isn't going to change the way future movies are made. It's well crafted, sure. But it isn't the most innovative thing to come down the pipe, either. Watchmen is no Pulp Fiction.

Plus, I don't think this film could have ever been made without the comic. When Hollywood attempts to create a gritty, revisionist take on the superhero story, the best it can pinch out is the purpose-built Hancock.

Anyway. I'm done. It's off my chest. I like the movie better than the comic.

Now, commence with the tearing apart....

Britney's Back *itch!

I'd kind of hoped that now that Obama was president stuff like this, UFC (Octogonodds) and tawdry porn (Sodahead) wouldn't happen in the U.S. any more. But that was probably too much to ask. Anyway, Britney debuted her new Circus tour in New Orlean's the other night. After a rough patch (Babble) in her life Britney's got a new hit single (Womanizer) and is trying to reestablish her credibility (Chismetime) as a top-notch pop star. Reviews of the show, which also featured the Pussycat Dolls (Blog), have been moderately positive (Radar). Gee, maybe if the tour catches fire she can jumpstart the U.S. economy! That would be a real stimulus package.

With All Due Respect, Etc...

I find that I am deeply dissatisfied with Dave Margoshes review of Regina’s new vegetarian restaurant, Beet Root, which appeared in last week’s Prairie Dog. (As a far off subscriber, I get my R-town news a week late.) Though the review was up to Dave’s usual standards of good writing and accurate menu description, I cannot trust it to be a useful account of Beet Root’s food. The reasons for this are twofold:

First, I have long suspected Mr. Margoshes of doing a bit of, shall we say, grade inflating when it comes to the Prairie Dog count of his reviews. Thus, a place like that grotty diner at College and Arcola, which reeked foul grease odour all down the block, and who’s staff scratched at open sores while they served, (I bloody well wish I was exaggerating,) received, when reviewed, the apparent bare minimum of three Prairie Dogs. I understand that Regina is a small city, and as the only local food reviewer*, Margoshes has to play nice or be shunned by restauranteurs en mass, but there is such a thing as inedible food. And inedible food should get no, zero, Prairie Dogs out of five. If Beet Root received 3.5 Dogs, I can only read that as meaning no better than that the meals were indeed edible. And that the servers refrained from scratching at themselves. I am sure that the restaurant is better than that; the text of the review makes it sound like a fairly nice joint, with tasty, nourishing food. But, having skewed his system of measurement in the past, Margoshes isn’t convincing me with his numbers.

Secondly, I would have valued the input of at least one actual vegetarian. The closest person present in the review identifies as “lapsed”. And yes, my own pro-veg prejudice pokes through here, but that often means someone who found themselves unable or unwilling to find or learn to make truly tasty meat-free food for themselves, and retreated to old and familiar eating habits. These guys are, I must say, awfully easy to impress with something just a little fancier than a tofu dog and some pasta primavera.

So, a few meat eaters, and one meat eater who gave it up briefly, visit Beet Root and declare it “Not bad, for rabbit food.” (I paraphrase, with snark aforethought, natch.) Are there any P.D. contributors or commenters who are actual herbivores, who have another opinion?

“But why,” asks the Reginian, “Does this Toronto-dweller give a darn about this one veggie restaurant of ours, or our rating review system?”

Dear Reader, I have in-laws. And I visit them. And, much as I adore being taken out for side vegetable medley, vinegary greek salad and Irish coffee at the Lakeview Steak House, sometimes I (And my fella, his brother, his brother’s wife, and all our various kiddos, vegetarians all,) like to dine somewhere where we can order from the whole menu. A really, really good vegetarian restaurant, serving food that we and our omnivorous family could enjoy, would rock our socks. And I care about the ratings because I think that no one, nowhere, should be content with food that is merely edible. We must have some standards of deliciousness, and the reviews should reflect that.

* Possibly the Leader-Post has a guy. Or maybe they just print an AP stringer's review of a restaurant in Vancouver. I'd have to read the thing to know.